Next Return Previous

Fusion

Version A

Terminal Rappel Eight

Compact Bent 8

Version A Terminal Rappel Eight Compact Bent 8
Version A Terminal Rappel Eight StarCompact Bent 8

Overview


Version A
(#1140, 1300)

Front Rear
Front Rear

Technical Details

I acquired this eight from Yi-tien Tuan in 2008, and a second one (sold as a BlueWater eight!) from from SteepWorld in 2011.

Version A is forged from aluminum alloy and then soft anodized. Mine is 171 mm. tall, 171 mm. wide, and 16 mm. thick. The rope hole is 63 mm. high and 72 mm. wide. The top center thickness is 13 mm. The shaft length and width are 48 mm. and 41 mm., respectively. The auxiliary hole is 31.9 mm. high and 16.3 mm. wide. The eye measures 35 mm. by 40 mm. The ears are 35.9 mm. long. My Fusion weighs 260 g.

One side has the Fusion icon and "45KN" in forged characters.

Comments

The Fusion is one of the following family of nearly identical forged aluminum rescue eights with ears:

Image Eight
Asol, Version B Asol, Version B
C-Wildyfield Wings 8 C-Wildyfield Wings 8
Climb Right Climb Right #85228
Climb X Rescue 8 With Ears Climb X Rescue 8 With Ears
Epic Peak Epic Peak
Image Eight
Fusion Fusion
Fusion Terminal Rappel 8 Fusion Terminal Rappel 8
Good Makings, Version A Good Makings, Version A
I Climb (???????) #633 I Climb (元鴻興有限公司) #633
 
Image Eight
Kong Big "8"(805.06) Kong Big "8" (805.06)
Mad Rock Rescue 8 Mad Rock Rescue 8
NewDoar NewDoar
NLNTL NLNTL
 
Image Eight
NTR NTR
Orbsoul Orbsoul
S.E.Peak SE–225 S.E.Peak SE–225
U.S. Rigging Supply<BR>Proclimb USR-835-AU U.S. Rigging
Supply Proclimb
USR–835–AU
 

Some of these eights are made in Europe, and some in Asia. Some are rebranded eights made by one manufacturer for others.

Each of these eights is 170±1 mm. tall and 170±2 mm. wide. Their weights fall in the 269±20 g. range. Although similar, these eights are not identical, and close inspection will reveal some minor differences in their shapes. Thickness variations account for much of the wide weight range. None of these affect their performance to any noticeable degree.

The Climbing Technology Ltd. eight is similar, but the ears are shaped differently. The Climb Right, Version B has a similar design, but it is a milled eight and is significantly smaller. There are several Kong steel eights that also have similar designs, some about the same size as the Kong Big "8" (805.06) in the table, some smaller.

The eyes and ears on these eights are larger than they need to be for most uses. The belay slot is a reasonable size for a Sticht slot, and insetting part of the slot into the useless portion of the upper rope hole reduces the length of the eight.

Like all rescue eights, these are too large and too heavy for an individual-use eight, and I see no reason to choose them in normal caving or climbing applications. I don't interfere with natural selection, not wanting to deal with the politics, but I question whether these are really the best option for rescue applications. They can be used, but there are smaller and lighter devices that will work better for anything I'm likely to do. The bigger-is-better crowd seems to like them, but I don't rappel on battleship mooring hawsers and I have no need for these.

Steepworld not only sold me a Fusion eight as a BlueWater eight, but they sold it with BlueWater eight instructions. Caveat emptor:

Instructions Instructions

Terminal Rappel Eight
(#1256)

Front Rear
Front Rear

Technical Details

I acquired my Fusion Terminal Rappel 8 new on eBay from Claudia Zavala in 2010.

The Fusion Terminal Rappel 8 is forged from aluminum alloy and then hard anodized. Mine is 170 mm. tall, 170 mm. wide, and 16 mm. thick. The rope hole is 63 mm. high and 71 mm. wide. The top center thickness is 13 mm. The shaft length and width are 48 mm. and  41 mm., respectively. The auxiliary hole is 31.9 mm. high and 16.2 mm. wide. The eye measures 35 mm. by 40 mm. The ears are 36.3 mm. long. My Fusion Terminal Rappel 8 weighs 254 g.

The front is printed with "FUSION," "45kN," and "KURA 10A."

Comments

The Fusion Terminal Rappel 8 is essentially the same as the original Fusion eight, with two minor changes.

  1. The Fusion Terminal Rappel 8is hard anodized. The hard anodizing should help it last longer.
  2. The markings on the Fusion Terminal Rappel 8 are printed rather than forged.

The Fusion is one of the following family of nearly identical forged aluminum rescue eights with ears:

Image Eight
Asol, Version B Asol, Version B
C-Wildyfield Wings 8 C-Wildyfield Wings 8
Climb Right Climb Right #85228
Climb X Rescue 8 With Ears Climb X Rescue 8 With Ears
Epic Peak Epic Peak
Image Eight
Fusion Fusion
Fusion Terminal Rappel 8 Fusion Terminal Rappel 8
Good Makings, Version A Good Makings, Version A
I Climb (???????) #633 I Climb (元鴻興有限公司) #633
 
Image Eight
Kong Big "8"(805.06) Kong Big "8" (805.06)
Mad Rock Rescue 8 Mad Rock Rescue 8
NewDoar NewDoar
NLNTL NLNTL
 
Image Eight
NTR NTR
Orbsoul Orbsoul
S.E.Peak SE–225 S.E.Peak SE–225
U.S. Rigging Supply<BR>Proclimb USR-835-AU U.S. Rigging
Supply Proclimb
USR–835–AU
 

Some of these eights are made in Europe, and some in Asia. Some are rebranded eights made by one manufacturer for others.

Each of these eights is 170±1 mm. tall and 170±2 mm. wide. Their weights fall in the 269±20 g. range. Although similar, these eights are not identical, and close inspection will reveal some minor differences in their shapes. Thickness variations account for much of the wide weight range. None of these affect their performance to any noticeable degree.

The Climbing Technology Ltd. eight is similar, but the ears are shaped differently. The Climb Right, Version B has a similar design, but it is a milled eight and is significantly smaller. There are several Kong steel eights that also have similar designs, some about the same size as the Kong Big "8" (805.06) in the table, some smaller.

The eyes and ears on these eights are larger than they need to be for most uses. The belay slot is a reasonable size for a Sticht slot, and insetting part of the slot into the useless portion of the upper rope hole reduces the length of the eight.

Like all rescue eights, these are too large and too heavy for an individual-use eight, and I see no reason to choose them in normal caving or climbing applications. I don't interfere with natural selection, not wanting to deal with the politics, but I question whether these are really the best option for rescue applications. They can be used, but there are smaller and lighter devices that will work better for anything I'm likely to do. The bigger-is-better crowd seems to like them, but I don't rappel on battleship mooring hawsers and I have no need for these.


StarCompact Bent 8
(#1410)

Front View Rear View Side View
Front View Rear View Side View

Technical Details

I acquired my Fusion Compact Bent 8 on eBay from Joyce Fabric in 2014.

The Compact Bent 8 is forged from aluminum alloy and then soft anodized. Mine is 111 mm. tall, 79 mm. wide, and 11 mm. thick. The rope hole is 35 mm. high and 53 mm. wide. The top center thickness is 11 mm. The shaft length and width are 27 mm. and 25 mm., respectively. The eye measures 20 mm. by 25 mm. The ears are 12.1 mm. long. My Compact Bent 8 weighs 88 g.

The concave side of the eight is printed with the Good Makings logo, "GM," a strength (not rigging) icon, and "25kN." The concave side of the shaft has "kN25" in raised forged letters.

Comments

This was sold as a Fusion eight by an eBay Fusion dealer, but it is obviously a Good Makings eight. I listed it here since the markings are slightly different than those on the matching Good Makings Version B.

This is one of the following family of nearly identical "mini"-size figure eights with ears:

Image Eight
Ace Ace
AMP Outdoor 8 AMP Outdoor 8
Image Eight
Climb X Mini Rescue 8 With Ears Climb X Mini Rescue 8
Faders Ballet Faders Ballet
Image Eight
Fusion (Good Makings) Compact Bent 8 Fusion (Good Makings)
Compact Bent 8
Good Makings, Version B Good Makings, Version B
Image Eight
Mad Rock Small Rescue 8 Mad Rock Small Rescue 8
Proverti CD 302 Proverti CD 302
Image Eight
Z&W Z&W
   

Each of these eights is 109±1 mm. tall and 80±1 mm. wide. Their weights fall in the 89±5 g. range. Although similar, these eights are not identical, and close inspection will reveal some minor differences in their shapes. None of these affect their performance to any noticeable degree.

These eights are smaller and much lighter than most figure eights with ears. While the advantages are manifest, there are two practical disadvantages:

  1. These eights give too much friction on stiff, muddy rope. This will not affect climbers using clean, limp climbing ropes, but for cavers using stiff ropes such as PMI pit rope, this is a concern. I've found times that I could not descend without hand-forcing the rope through my eight, and I'm nearly 90 kg. (198 lb.), not exactly light (even for being 1.93 m. tall).
  2. Their small size does not not work well with doubled rope. While climbers may be able to work around this, especially if they are using thinner ropes, cavers using stiff pit rope will find it difficult to rig a double-rope rappel. If they succeed, descent may be impossible.

The holes in the ears provide a place to tie a keeper cord, if you believe in such things. To me, the nuisance of keeping the keeper away from the main rope outweighs their value.

The rope hole is shorter than normal, so these eights may provide too much friction on stiff or muddy ropes. If these were flat (like the similar Kailas Multi 8), they would create more friction than most eights. The bend allows them to be rigged two ways with differing amounts of friction, one with less friction than the Kailas and one with more.

Other small eights have similar bends. Examples are the Chouinard Version B, Faders Versions A and B, Frendo Version B, and the Trango Penta. The significant difference is that this eight and its equivalents also have ears. Better yet, the ears are placed low where they can function effectively without increasing the size of the eight. The idea behind ears is that they reduce the chance of an eight girth-hitching. They are not strictly needed, as girth hitching is neither likely nor more than a minor nuisance to a competent user. For eared eights, I like this design enough to give each example a star.Star


For far more content, use a larger monitor and a full-width window.

Hundreds of cell phone users complained and asked me to for a simpler, mobile friendly site. In particular, they wanted me to limit each page to a small number of pictures and minimize my use of text. This new site provides what they asked for.