Be↗Up
Double
Double V-Row
Be↗Up | Double | Double V-Row |
[ Top | Double | Double V-Row | Return to Belay Tubes ]
Front | Rear | Top |
Left | Right | Bottom |
I acquired my Climbing Technology Be↗Up from Expé-Spelemat in2015.
The Climbing Technology Be↗Up is a notched belay tube. It is forged from aluminum alloy, folded in the process, and then soft anodized. The ends of the fold are pinned together with a 5 mm. stainless steel pin. Mine is 80 mm. long, 41 mm. wide, 90 mm. high, and weighs 86 g. The slots are 33 mm. long and 13 mm. wide. Each slot has two shallow grooves on each side. The top of the Omega oval carabiner that I use for comparing belay tubes sits 36 mm. below the ends of the slots.
One side is printed "MADE IN ITALY," a rigging illustration (for a lead climber), with the Climbing Technologies CT logo, "BE↗UP, and "climbing technology. The other side is printed with a rigging illustration (for top-roping), "0215," "EN15151-2," "UIAA," a book-with-an-"i" icon, "ROPE EN 892," "1Ø 8.5÷10.5 mm,"and "∞½Ø 7.3÷8 mm," a three-ring icon, and "ANCHOR."
The Be↗Up’s unique shape gives it much deeper slots without increasing the mass by much. This in itself is not a particular advantage. The open construction provides more surface area for heat dissipation, but the lower mass gives less ability to absorb heat. Like all belay tubes, the Be↗Up can get quite hot when used as a rappel device.
The folded construction also provides a natural eye for attaching the Be↗Up to the anchor.
The slots do not seem to provide the effective braking that the slots on the Double V-Row provide.
[ Top | Be↗Up | Double V-Row | Return to Belay Tubes ]
Front | Rear | Top |
Left | Right | Bottom |
I acquired my Climbing Technology Double from Lior Porian in 2015.
The Double is a standard belay tube. Mine is 56 mm. long, 47 mm. wide, 96 mm. high, and weighs 62 g. It is forged from aluminum alloy and then soft anodized. It has two slots and a stiff plastic covered cable keeper. The slots are 31 mm. long and 15 mm. wide. The top of the Omega oval carabiner that I use for comparing belay tubes sits 14 mm. below the ends of the slots.
One side is printed with the Climbing Technologies CT logo, the UIAA logo, "Italy," "0114-2014," and a rigging illustration.
The Climbing Technology Double is one of the following closely-related belay tubes, all called "ATCs" after the original Black Diamond Air Traffic Controller:
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Each of these is 54±3 mm. long, 46±1 mm. wide, and weighs 59±9 g. Their slots are all 32±1 mm. long and 14±1 mm. wide. They all have plastic-covered cable keepers.
The Black Diamond ATC was the first of these to appear, by many years. The basic design evolved and similar devices appeared from others.
The ATC is a lightweight, popular belaying device among climbers. Rigging is simple: insert a bight of rope and clip it with a suitably anchored carabiner, making sure that the rope is not running over the keeper. Two-rope rigging is similar. On thinner ropes, adding another carabiner helps.
My biggest complaint is that none of these give me enough friction when rappelling with a heavy load on fast 9 mm. rope. I also prefer more friction while belaying, unless my partner is particularly lightweight. For these reasons, I prefer using a Trango Jaws or one of its equivalents.
Any of these will overheat badly on long rappels. Overheating is not an issue when belaying, but can be a concern when lowering someone more than a short distance.
There are four different shell styles in use::
The differences between the styles are cosmetic rather than functional.
None of the keepers-to-shell are strong enough to support body weight, so don't be stupid enough to rely on a keeper to protect you.
There are also several different diameter keeper cables used on these. Cable keepers are a compromise between a cord that stows easily but tends to get tangled in use, and a rigid rod that stands up to the rope running over it (by accident, of course). I prefer a stiff keeper, but any of these are stiff enough to be used without significant problems.
[ Top | Be↗Up | Double | Return to Belay Tubes ]
Front | Rear | Top |
Left | Right | Bottom |
I acquired my Climbing Technology Double V-Row from Lior Porian in 2015.
The Double V-Row is a notched belay tube. It is forged from aluminum alloy and then hard anodized. It has two slots with a deep V-groove at one end of each slot. Mine is 60 mm. long, 48 mm. wide, 109 mm. high, and weighs 74 g. The slots are 33 mm. long and 15 mm. wide. The top of the Omega oval carabiner that I use for comparing belay tubes sits 13 mm. below the ends of the slots.
One side is printed with the Climbing Technologies CT logo, a rigging illustration, "Italy," "0111," and the UIAA logo.
The following are essentially the same device:
I like this design enough to give it three stars:
The following notched belay tubes, including the Climbing Technology Double�V-Row, are essentially the same device:
Each of these is 60±1 mm. long and 48±1 mm. wide, and has a weight in the 76±3 g. range. Their slots are all 33 mm. long and 15 mm. wide.
These are just like many other devices except for one little difference, but that difference makes any of these a much better device than those others. The special feature is the teeth. First of all, if you don't need them, turn the device 180 degrees and they are out of the way. On the other hand, if you want more friction, then these teeth canprovide it. This is the only device design of this size and weight that I feel comfortable rappelling my 9 mm. haul line on. With any others, I never really felt completely in control (to be fair, I haven't tried this on the the Omega Pacific SBG or the Simond Cubik). The extra control is well worth carrying the extra 15 or 20 grams. One caution: like all belay tubes and tubers, these can get very hot on rappels.
I borrowed the following paragraphs from Trango's web site, although they should apply to any of the devices in the table:
Jaws stops better than most belay/rappel devices. The addition of the V notches really grabs the rope, assisting in slowing down the fall. In lab tests using a UIAA drop tower, an 11 mm. rope, an 80-kg weight with a fall factor of 1.2, and a clutch holding the rope with a 50-lbf slip threshold, we found the following results:
Pyramid/ATC/Tuber style devices 16" - 20" slip, no rope damage GriGri 1" - 3" slip, no rope damage Jaws 6" - 8" slip, no rope damage Jaws allows you to adjust the rope friction during a rappel. By flipping the rope out of the notches and over the side plates at the start of a long rappel, you can reduce the friction the device gives you at the start. When the rappel begins to speed up as you get closer to the ground, flip the ropes back into the notches to slow it down.
You must rig Jaws correctly. It's not symmetrical so you need to be sure the notches are on the brake hand side of the rope, not on the side which goes to the leader. Also, because of the additional friction provided by the device you'll find that the beginnings of long rappels can be a bit jerky. The solution is to allow rope to slide through by varying the angle of your brake hand rather than just letting rope slip through. On low angle slab rappels, turn Jaws around so the notches are on the anchor side and your brake hand is on the smooth side.
[ Top | Be↗Up | Double | Double V-Row ]
For far more content, use a larger monitor and a full-width window.
Hundreds of cell phone users complained and asked me to for a simpler, mobile friendly site. In particular, they wanted me to limit each page to a small number of pictures and minimize my use of text. This new site provides what they asked for.