Version A
Version B
Version A | Version B |
[ Top | Version B | Return to H.E.C. Ascenders ]
Front View: Closed | Rear View: Closed |
Front View: Open for Rigging | Rear View: Open for Rigging |
I acquired my right-hand Fusion Voltron version from World Lifestyle Shop in 2018. I acquired a matching left-handed one from Amazon.com in 2023.
This version is 191 mm. tall, 89 mm. wide, 27 mm. thick, and weighs 205 g.
The shell is a tall irregular shaped stamping made from 2.9 mm. aluminum alloy sheet metal. The upper part of the shell has a stamped reinforcing ridge that extends down into the handle. A 15 mm. rope channel is formed in the upper portion of one side and a smaller cam channel lies opposite the first. A hole drilled through both sides of the cam channel accepts a 5 mm. rivet. The cam and cam spring are mounted on this rivet. The handle below the cam has a soft black rubbery hand grip molded into place. The hand grip has an index finger support. A 26.8 mm. by 16 mm. sling attachment hole is punched below the handle opening. A 15 mm. by 15.5 mm. hole through both sides of the rope channel provides an attachment point just above the cam.
The cam is a plated steel casting. The cam has number of small conical teeth, all of which have their axes approximately parallel to the upper surface of the cam. The cam radius increases from 37 to 54 mm. over an angle of 38°, giving a 30° cam angle. The tooth pattern is (3.4)(1S1)^2(2S2)(1S1)^3(2.3.2.2.3) where the S stands for a central slot. Like the other ascenders, the inner cam face radius reduces from top to bottom to accommodate various sized ropes. A spring-loaded plastic safety is mounted on the bottom of the cam with a steel rivet. The normal action of the spring holds the safety against the cam. When the cam is opened, the shell interferes with the safety bar, thus preventing opening the cam. If the safety bar is moved away from the cam (opposing the spring), it will clear the shell and the cam will open. At full open the safety can be released and the spring will hold the safety against the back of the shell. This provides a means of locking the cam open. A knob on the safety bar assists in operating the safety mechanism.
The front of the ascender is printed with a hollow up-pointing arrow containing "UP," the Fusion Logo, "FUSION™" "VOLTRON" and "FP-7215-R." The top rear is printed with "CE" (in Latin letters, not the Conformité Européene mark), "EN 567:2013," "8-13mm," "100kg" (right-hand ascender only) "CHINO.CA USA," "17D1" (22A on the left-hand ascender), and "PLEASE READ INSTRUCTION BEFORE USE." The rear of the front strap on the right-hand ascender is printed with "←2KN→."
These ascenders have the same design, with differences only in the color of their anodizing and in their markings:
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
These are well-made ascenders and perform much like the Petzl Ascension. All sharp edges have been removed. The attachment points are simple holes in the shell. They have sharp edges that should be rounded with a file; even so, I would consider their small radius too sharp for directly attaching sling ropes. They are probably acceptable for webbing, but considering the proximity of the attachment points to the main rope, I would recommend using a small maillon for most attachments in order to reduce the risk of sling abrasion.
The upper rope attachment hole is located very close to the main rope. A carabiner through the upper attachment hole will probably drag on the main line. Note that such a carabiner will prevent putting the ascender on or off rope, so one's climbing system must be designed accordingly.
The handgrips are almost large enough to be comfortable for my large hands, provided I don't wear gloves. In any case, I don't climb by gripping ascenders at their handle. I think it is better to simply grasp the ascender from above and lift the ascender in the traditional manner (unless, of course, you are one of those who prefers to climb Frog).
The cam is very well made. The cam stop is placed in a position where it will touch the cam if the ascender is off rope. This keeps the face of the cam away from the inner surface of the rope groove, a nice but unnecessary feature. I don't see much need for cam stops, most active cavers don't weight enough to bend their ascenders to failure by cam pull-through, and there is no need to shock load one's ascenders.
The safety has a ribbed thumb surface. One-handed operation is smooth and comfortable.
These ascenders have the same pit lip disadvantage as the Clog and other stamped frame ascenders, although the reinforcing will help prevent bending.
The lower attachment hole is large enough to accommodate two normal carabiners, but I don't think carabiners are the best way to attach caving slings to ascenders, as there is too much chance of having the ascender slide down and load the carabiner gate.
[ Top | Version A | Return to H.E.C. Ascenders ]
Front View: Closed | Rear View: Closed |
Front View: Open for Rigging | Rear View: Open for Rigging |
I acquired my left-hand Fusion Voltron Version B from World Lifestyle Shop in 2019, and my right-hand from Amazon.com in 2020.
This version is 195 mm. tall, 92 mm. wide, 25 mm. thick, and weighs 175 g.
This is not a carbon-fiber ascender, but is painted to look like one.
This version has a painted cam instead of a plated cam.
The front of the ascender is printed with a hollow up-pointing arrow containing "UP," the Fusion Logo, "FUSION™" "VOLTRON" and "FP-7215-R." The top rear is printed with "CE" (in Latin letters, not the Conformité Européene mark), "EN 567:2013," "8-13mm," "100kg," "CHINO.CA USA," "17D1," "PLEASE READ INSTRUCTION BEFORE USE."
This is not a carbon-fiber ascender - it is merely painted to look like one. It is basically the same as the previous version, except the cam is painted rather than plated.
These ascenders have the same design, with differences only in the color of their anodizing and in their markings:
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
These are well-made ascenders and perform much like the Petzl Ascension. All sharp edges have been removed. The attachment points are simple holes in the shell. They have sharp edges that should be rounded with a file; even so, I would consider their small radius too sharp for directly attaching sling ropes. They are probably acceptable for webbing, but considering the proximity of the attachment points to the main rope, I would recommend using a small maillon for most attachments in order to reduce the risk of sling abrasion.
The upper rope attachment hole is located very close to the main rope. A carabiner through the upper attachment hole will probably drag on the main line. Note that such a carabiner will prevent putting the ascender on or off rope, so one's climbing system must be designed accordingly.
The handgrips are almost large enough to be comfortable for my large hands, provided I don't wear gloves. In any case, I don't climb by gripping ascenders at their handle. I think it is better to simply grasp the ascender from above and lift the ascender in the traditional manner (unless, of course, you are one of those who prefers to climb Frog).
The cam is very well made. The cam stop is placed in a position where it will touch the cam if the ascender is off rope. This keeps the face of the cam away from the inner surface of the rope groove, a nice but unnecessary feature. I don't see much need for cam stops, most active cavers don't weight enough to bend their ascenders to failure by cam pull-through, and there is no need to shock load one's ascenders.
The safety has a ribbed thumb surface. One-handed operation is smooth and comfortable.
These ascenders have the same pit lip disadvantage as the Clog and other stamped frame ascenders, although the reinforcing will help prevent bending.
The lower attachment hole is large enough to accommodate two normal carabiners, but I don't think carabiners are the best way to attach caving slings to ascenders, as there is too much chance of having the ascender slide down and load the carabiner gate.
For far more content, use a larger monitor and a full-width window.
Hundreds of cell phone users complained and asked me to for a simpler, mobile friendly site. In particular, they wanted me to limit each page to a small number of pictures and minimize my use of text. This new site provides what they asked for.